In Interest of T.C., — So.3d —- (2018) Mother sought certiorari review of the trial court’s order that placed two of her children in a permanent guardianship with their paternal grandparents and gave the father permanent custody of a third child. Mother argued that the trial court departed from the essential requirements of the law […]
Case Plan Amendment: Trial court departed from the essential requirements of law when it changed case plan goal from reunification to permanent guardianship without an adequate evidentiary basis
S.C.P. v. Department of Children and Families, 220 So.3d 1290 (2017) Only a few months after accepting a reunification case plan, the court changed the goal of mother’s case plan from reunification to permanent guardianship, despite finding the mother in compliance with her case plan. Noting that the rules and statutes contemplate an evidentiary basis […]
Postdisposition Change of Custody: Order effectively granting reunification quashed where dependency court failed to apply proper statutory provisions, misconstrued the evidence and findings were not supported by competent substantial evidence.
In the Interest of I.N., a child. E.N., Petitioner, v…., — So.3d —- (2017) The Second DCA reversed a trial court’s order which “effectively reunified” a child with a father who is alleged to have sexually abused the child. The DCA found that the trial court departed from the essential requirements of law by failing […]
In re R.T., 2015 WL 1259666 (Fla. 2d DCA)
Mother petitioned the court for a writ of certiorari seeking to quash the trial court’s order requiring her three teenage sons to undergo therapeutic assessments in connection with the denial of Mother’s motion to amend a safety plan prohibiting Mother’s husband, S.K., from having contact with her sons. The Second District Court of Appeal (Second […]
M.P. v. Department of Children and Families, 2015 WL 1044156 (Fla 4th DCA)
Father appealed an Order of Adjudication of Dependency and Order of Disposition and Case Plan Approval. The Fourth District Court of Appeal (Fourth DCA) affirmed adjudication but remanded to strike several unsupported findings from the order and reversed the need for the Father to submit to random drug testing from his case plan. With regard […]
