Department of Children and Families v. B.C., 2016 WL 635072 (Fla. 1st DCA)

The Department of Children and Families and the Guardian ad Litem Program appealed denial of a petition for termination of parental rights. The First District Court of Appeal (First DCA) reversed denial and remanded for further proceedings. Although the trial court found the termination of parental rights was statutorily warranted and in the manifest best […]

Department of Children and Families v. B.C., 2016 WL 635072 (Fla. 1st DCA)

To terminate parental rights there must be: the existence of a statutory ground for termination under § 39.806; that termination is in the child’s manifest best interests under § 39.810; and the termination of parental rights is the least restrictive means of protecting the child from serious harm. The trial court concluded based on clear […]

Statewide Guardian ad Litem Program v. A.A., 2015 WL 4510417 (Fla. 5th DCA)

The Statewide Guardian ad Litem Program (GAL) and the Department of Children and Families (DCF) appealed the trial court’s Final Judgment Denying Involuntary Termination of Parental Rights and Ordering a Permanent Guardianship Case Plan. The trial court found that DCF proved statutory grounds for termination as to Mother and Father by clear and convincing evidence […]

A.S. v. Department of Children and Families, 2015 WL 1448507 (Fla. 4th DCA)

Father appealed termination of his parental rights. The Fourth District Court of Appeal (Fourth DCA) reversed the termination holding that the trial court erred in finding that Father abandoned his child and that termination was the least restrictive means to protect the child. J.A. was born in September of 2012 and placed in care immediately […]

C.D. v. Department of Children and Families, 2015 WL 848157 (Fla. 1st DCA)

Mother appealed a decision terminating her parental rights. The First District Court of Appeal (First DCA) reversed and remanded only the trial court’s ruling that termination was the least restrictive means of protecting her children from harm. At the termination trial, Dr. Flynn, the family therapist working with mother and the children, testified that he […]

State v. T.S., 155 So.3d 476 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015)

The trial court found that the Department of Children and Families (Department) met the statutory factors for termination of parental rights and established that termination was in the best interests of the child but denied termination, finding it was not the least restrictive means to protect the child. The Department appealed the findings related to […]

A.H. v. Department of Children and Families, 144 So. 3d 662 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014)

Mother appealed termination of her parental rights arguing that the court’s findings that that she abandoned her child and that termination was the least restrictive means of protecting the child were erroneous. The First District Court of Appeal (First DCA) reversed termination solely on the issue that the trial court failed to find that termination […]